[#item_full_content] A lawyer from Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office advised voters to “read the fine print” before they potentially upend the state’s recreational cannabis laws this fall, while an attorney trying to convince the Supreme Judicial Court to toss the question described the AG’s summary as “grossly deficient.” In its final initiative petition case on May 4, the SJC grappled with whether Campbell’s constitutionally required summary left out key details about a petition to repeal the 2016 legalization of recreational marijuana, and whether the AG should not have certified the multifaceted measure if it contains unrelated policy sections. The lawsuit was 
Read More
