[[“value”:”

Request webinar recording for Fourth Circuit Issues Opinion Regarding Hemp-Derived (Delta-9) Products in Case Involving ADA Claims

Agree to Terms(Required)

Please understand that merely contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. We cannot become your lawyers or represent you in any way unless (1) we know that doing so would not create a conflict of interest with any of the clients we represent, and (2) satisfactory arrangements have been made with us for representation. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you unless we have agreed that we will be your lawyers and represent your interests and you have received a letter from us to that effect (called an engagement letter).
NOTE: Webinar recordings are reserved for clients (or clients of the firm).

First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)

Request Transcript

Please understand that merely contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. We cannot become your lawyers or represent you in any way unless (1) we know that doing so would not create a conflict of interest with any of the clients we represent, and (2) satisfactory arrangements have been made with us for representation. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you unless we have agreed that we will be your lawyers and represent your interests and you have received a letter from us to that effect (called an
engagement letter).
NOTE: Podcast transcripts are reserved for clients (or clients of the firm).

First Name(Required)Last Name(Required)

Fill out the form below to share the job Fourth Circuit Issues Opinion Regarding Hemp-Derived (Delta-9) Products in Case Involving ADA Claims

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“]] On September 4, 2024, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Anderson v. Diamondback Investment Group, LLC, ruled on whether a former employee’s use of lawful hemp-derived products containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to treat anxiety and muscle spasms formed a sufficient basis for an unlawful termination and failure to accommodate claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Fourth Circuit questioned whether the former employee established that she was, in fact, disabled as defined by the ADA, and whether she actually requested an accommodation during her employment. Read More   

Author:

By